How do you access the important moments in your life?

Not the moments the world sees.

I mean the great personal moments, the ones that matter most.

I’m certain I’m not alone when I say that music has been a direct pathway to my memory of these moments.

Like this: I am not someone who stays up all night, ever, but when my first book was due and I was just 21 and so scared, I sat at the typewriter until dawn, playing Dylan’s “Blonde on Blonde” over and over as I wrote, and then, as the business day started, I walked the manuscript to my publisher with a confidence I wish I felt every day. Ever since, whenever “Visions of Johanna” shows up….

That memory is the exception. Most connected to music are connected also to women. The happy memories have a varied play list: The Four Tops, Otis Redding, Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan. The heavier memories — almost all of them — are linked to the songs of Leonard Cohen.

If you’re in the Cohen Cult, you have a list like mine. As someone has said, “You play Leonard after the lovers have left and are in the arms of others.” Not always. Sometimes the women were there, and so was a kind of distress you didn’t understand and didn’t particularly want but couldn’t resist — like a black-and-blue mark you can’t help pressing, I used to think. There was something about that pain….

The creator of those songs always knew all about that. He picked up the guitar as a kid because he sensed it could help him with girls. It worked — Cohen is catnip to many of the women in my life. As Cohen now says, “It was agreeable to have some kind of a reputation or some kind of list of credentials so you didn’t have to start from scratch with every woman you walked into.” Look around a Cohen concert and even now, when he says it doesn’t matter, you’ll see women who look at him as their romantic ideal.

Leonard Cohen is now 77. A few years ago, his manager stole most of his money, so he went on a two-year tour, giving long shows that were as close to perfect as anything we’re ever likely to see. Everyone who saw Cohen on that tour will hold tight to the image of a thin man in a gray suit, tipping his fedora to his audience in gratitude and humility as he delivered what might euphemistically be called his greatest hits.

I remember we were playing in Ireland and the reception was so warm that tears came to my eyes and I thought, ‘I can’t be seen weeping at this point,’ then I turned around and saw the guitar player weeping.”

When the tour was over, he went into the studio with 10 new songs and recorded a CD ironically titled “Old Ideas.” That too was bracing — it’s very likely he’ll tour again and, perhaps for the last time, we’ll see the dapper gent in the gray suit tip his fedora to us in humility and gratitude.

I was not exactly looking forward to this CD. His last, “Dear Heather,” was a weak effort, a marker of decline. Worse than decline; it sounded as if he was borderline addled, incapable of realizing that he really shouldn’t be releasing this.

But a week before the launch of “Old Ideas” you can hear a free stream of the entire CD. I couldn’t resist. [To hear "Old Ideas" now, click here. To pre-order the CD --- for $9.99 --- from Amazon, click here. For the MP3 download, click here.]

So…is this an old man’s record? It would be easy to make the case. “I’ve got no future, I know my days are few,” he sings. “I thought the past would last me, but the darkness got that too.” As for thinking about death — he practices Zen, you’d better believe his extinction has come up for him. “I’ve come to the conclusion, reluctantly, that I am going to die,” he told a recent interviewer. “So naturally those questions arise and are addressed. But, you know, I like to do it with a beat.”

And yet “Old Ideas” is anything but a valedictory. It’s taut, vital music, stripped of the electronic gimmicky that sounded so cool a few records ago and got tiresome when they seemed to be covering for weak songs and a weakening voice. You’ll hear bits of JJ Cale here, and an echo of “Old Black Joe,” and, in the background, smart homages to his own work. (For the best example, listen to “Darkness.”)

That’s the music. The lyrics are something else: considered, bone-deep, precise. And smart in a way that looks like his best work — a reach for what is eternally true. Here’s his method:

I don’t really like songs with ideas. They tend to become slogans. They tend to be on the right side of things: ecology or vegetarianism or antiwar. All these are wonderful ideas but I like to work on a song until those slogans, as wonderful as they are and as wholesome as the ideas they promote are, dissolve into deeper convictions of the heart. I never set out to write a didactic song. It’s just my experience. All I’ve got to put in a song is my own experience.

“My own experience” is precisely why we put on the headphones, light the candles, make ceremony out of listening. Because Leonard Cohen, for those who love him, is older than time and younger than tomorrow. He insists he has no answers — “Who’s to blame in this catastrophe? I never figured that out” — but we know he does something even more important: He asks the right questions.

BONUS STUFF

Dorian Lynskey of The Guardian had a terrific conversation with Cohen.

And here is a speech he gave when he received an award. Notice how, without notes, he’s word-perfect.

[Cross-posted from HeadButler.com]

?

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jesse-kornbluth/leonard-cohen-at-77-calls_b_1227640.html

facebook timeline kim jong il kim jong il vaclav havel vaclav havel kim jong ii dead snapdragon

Hello I joined this site not long agon and I wanted to know

Would anyone want to RP in the Mass Effect Universe?

It would most likely be outside of the games plot line maybe hearing about it but in no way apart of it and it probably wouldn’t include Commander Shepard.

I would need a co Gm for help to make this a reality but I think it’d be fun.

I’d also accept anyone who has suggestions or wants to co GM with me or what have you.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RolePlayGateway/~3/2L1fUyW0AP4/viewtopic.php

the view plantronics bloody sunday lions dental insurance klimt sugar ray leonard

NEW YORK ? A jury has been chosen at a New York trial resulting from a $20 million dispute between billionaire Ronald Perelman (PURL’-muhn) and a onetime close friend and business partner.

Opening arguments were expected Tuesday afternoon.

The trial centers on claims that Donald Drapkin (DRAYP’-kihn) brought against Perelman in 2009 after he left Perelman’s holding company, MacAndrews & Forbes, to run a hedge fund. He says he didn’t receive roughly $20 million in compensation that he was promised. Perelman countersued, saying payments to Drapkin were stopped when he didn’t keep his obligations.

The trial is unusual because it involves a relatively small amount of money given the net worth of the men involved. Civil disputes of this sort frequently are settled prior to trial.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/crime/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120124/ap_on_re_us/us_perelman_trial

forgetting sarah marshall asterisk joplin missouri alicia keys kirstie alley duke energy oscar de la hoya

Richard Gere walks the red carpet during the 6th International Rome Film Festival in Rome, Italy, on November 3, 2011 -- Getty Premium

Richard Gere has one of the most buzzed about movies at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival with “Arbitrage,” and he hopes the project will have an impact with a wider audience.

“It’s going to resonate with [the Bernie] Madoff [scandal] and a lot of other problems we’ve had with the morality of our money system,” Richard told Access Hollywood correspondent Tim Vincent.

PLAY IT NOW: Access Hollywood Live: Tim Vincent?s 2012 Sundance Film Festival Update – Bruce Willis? Baby Watch & Tracy Morgan?s Health Scare

The film takes its name from a type of trading, the actor said.

“It’s actually, it’s a way to make money,” Richard said, when Tim asked about the title. “You buy small and you sell heavy and it’s a very computerized thing. It has to be done in milliseconds to make money. This is a story about a guy who’s made a lot of money from that game.”

VIEW THE PHOTOS: 2012 Sundance Film Festival

Richard famously played corporation trader Edward Lewis in “Pretty Woman,” but he said the only thing Edward and his “Arbitrage” character, Robert Miller, have in common is being in the world of business.

“He was a corporate raider. This guy’s not a corporate raider. It’s more conceptual what this guy does. Money itself, isn’t an object, it’s in the digital world. There’s nothing you can hold on to any more, it’s always moving,” he said.

Like his “Pretty Woman,” character, Robert Miller is popular with the ladies, even the ones he doesn’t hire, and when talk turned to women, Tim asked if Richard would like to reunite with Julia Roberts on the big screen.

VIEW THE PHOTOS: Big Screen Gentlemen: Hollywood?s Leading Men

“Of course,” Richard said.

“She’s a lot older than me, so I don’t know if it’s gonna work,” he joked.

VIEW THE PHOTOS: Everyone?s Favorite ?Pretty Woman? Julia Roberts!

Copyright 2012 by NBC Universal, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/entertainment/*http%3A//us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/external/omg_rss/rss_omg_en/news_richard_gere_talks_sundance_film_arbitrage_julia_roberts020257273/44280235/*http%3A//omg.yahoo.com/news/richard-gere-talks-sundance-film-arbitrage-julia-roberts-020257273.html

winnipeg air conditioner sports illustrated portable air conditioner call of duty elite lrg basketball wives

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics – Top Stories Stories, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/190609091?client_source=feed&format=rss

jets air jordans pecan pie recipe prince philip david wright sugar cookie recipe sugar cookie recipe

WASHINGTON ? Senate Republicans are returning to Washington in an angry mood over President Barack Obama’s appointments to two key agencies during a year-end break.

More than 70 nominees to judgeships and senior federal agency positions are awaiting the next move from Republicans, who can use Senate rules to block votes on some or all of Obama’s picks.

While Republicans return Monday to discuss their next step, recess appointee Richard Cordray is running a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and the National Labor Relations Board ? with three temporary members ? is now at full strength with a Democratic majority.

Obama left more than 70 other nominees in limbo, well aware that Republicans could use Senate rules to block them.

The White House justified the appointments on grounds that Republicans were holding up the nominations to paralyze the two agencies. The consumer protection agency was established under the 2010 Wall Street reform law, which requires the bureau to have a director in order to begin policing financial products such as mortgages, checking accounts, credit cards and payday loans.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the five-member NLRB must have a three-member quorum to issue regulations or decide major cases in union-employer disputes.

Several agencies contacted by The Associated Press, including banking regulators, said they were conducting their normal business despite vacancies at the top. In some cases, nominees are serving in acting capacities.

At full strength, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. has five board members. The regulation of failed banks “is unaffected,” said spokesman Andrew Gray. “The three-member board has been able to make decisions without a problem.” Cordray’s appointment gives it a fourth member.

The Comptroller of the Currency, run by an acting chief, has kept up its regular examinations of banks. The Federal Trade Commission, operating with four board members and one vacancy, usually makes decisions unanimously.

The State Department, however, said it’s important to U.S. diplomacy to fill the post of assistant secretary for western hemisphere affairs and the ambassadorships to El Salvador and Ecuador.

“”We value highly our relationship with our hemispheric partners and consider diplomatic representation at the level of ambassador a top priority. This is especially true of the top diplomat charged with hemispheric relations, the assistant secretary,” said William Ostick, a State Department spokesman.

Republicans have pledged retaliation for Obama’s recess appointments, but haven’t indicated what it might be.

“The Senate will need to take action to check and balance President Obama’s blatant attempt to circumvent the Senate and the Constitution, a claim of presidential power that the Bush administration refused to make,” said Sen. Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican who is his party’s top member on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Grassley wouldn’t go further, and Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky hasn’t tipped his hand after charging that Obama had “arrogantly circumvented the American people.” Before the Senate left for its break in December, McConnell blocked Senate approval of more than 60 pending nominees because Obama wouldn’t commit to making no recess appointments.

Republicans have to consider whether their actions, especially any decision to block all nominees, might play into Obama’s hands.

Obama has adopted an election-year theme of “we can’t wait” for Republicans to act on nominations and major proposals like his latest jobs plan. Republicans have to consider how their argument that the president is violating Constitutional checks and balances plays against Obama’s stump speeches characterizing them as obstructionists.

Senate historian Donald Ritchie said the minority party has retaliated in the past for recess appointments by holding up specific nominees. “I’m not aware of any situations where no nominations were accepted,” he said. The normal practice is for the two party leaders to negotiate which nominations get votes.

During the break, Republicans forced the Senate to convene for usually less than a minute once every few days to argue that there was no recess and that Obama therefore couldn’t bypass the Senate’s authority to confirm top officials. The administration said this was a sham, and has released a Justice Department opinion backing up the legality of the appointments.

Obama considers the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau a signature achievement of his first term. Republicans have been vehemently opposed to the bureau’s setup. They argued the agency needed a bipartisan board instead of a director and should have to justify its budget to Congress instead of drawing its funding from the independent Federal Reserve.

Cordray is expected to get several sharp questions from Republicans when he testifies Tuesday before a House Oversight and Government Reform panel.

The NLRB has been a target of Republicans and business groups. Last year, the agency accused Boeing of illegally retaliating against union workers who had struck its plants in Washington state by opening a new production line at its non-union plant in South Carolina. Boeing denied the charge and the case has since been settled, but Republican anger over it and a string of union-friendly decisions from the board last year hasn’t abated.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/politics/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120123/ap_on_go_co/us_nominations_spat

comfort inn orioles liberty mutual bahamas erin brockovich serbia huguette clark

Mike Rowe is always cracking jokes, pulling pranks and generally having a lot of fun as he tackles various different “Dirty Jobs” (Tue., 9 p.m. EST on Discovery). On this week’s installment, he got on board with the team at Medical Waste Transport, Inc. So the guys got together to turn things around on Rowe as he was learning the tricks of their trade.

“You said something about inspecting it though, before it comes in?” Rowe asked, regarding a collection of red barrels. But when he opened one, he got quite a startle. After he jumped away with a yelp, he realized they’d only stuffed a mannequin inside the barrel. He was certainly able to appreciate a good joke, going on and on about how well they’d gotten him.

Then, he shifted into typical bad-jokes-and-puns Mike Rowe. “We lost another executive producer,” he quipped. When one of the guys held out the arm they’d put in there with the head, Rowe added, “You really went out on a limb with this thing. No, I gotta hand it to you.”

Find out where Mike ends up next as “Dirty Jobs” continues every Tuesday at 9 p.m. EST on Discovery.

TV Replay scours the vast television landscape to find the most interesting, amusing, and, on a good day, amazing moments, and delivers them right to your browser.

Related on HuffPost:

MONDAY, JANUARY 23: “Gossip Girl”

1? of ?19

“Gossip Girl” (8 p.m. EST, The CW) “Clueless” writer/director Amy Heckerling makes her first foray into TV directing since 2005 for Blair’s bachelorette party, as others scheme behind Queen B’s back to make it a night to remember. After discovering the truth behind Chuck and Blair’s car accident, Nate joins forces with a surprising ally to gather the evidence, while Serena and Dan pretend to be dating again to protect Blair’s secret. “Gossip Girl” (8 p.m. EST, The CW)
“Clueless” writer/director Amy Heckerling makes her first foray into TV directing since 2005 for Blair’s bachelorette party, as others scheme behind Queen B’s back to make it a night to remember. After discovering the truth behind Chuck and Blair’s car accident, Nate joins forces with a surprising ally to gather the evidence, while Serena and Dan pretend to be dating again to protect Blair’s secret.

MORE SLIDESHOWS NEXT?> ??|?? <?PREV

MONDAY, JANUARY 23: “Gossip Girl”

“Gossip Girl” (8 p.m. EST, The CW) “Clueless” writer/director Amy Heckerling makes her first foray into TV directing since 2005 for Blair’s bachelorette party, as others scheme behind Queen B’s back to make it a night to remember. After discovering the truth behind Chuck and Blair’s car accident, Nate joins forces with a surprising ally to gather the evidence, while Serena and Dan pretend to be dating again to protect Blair’s secret. “; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, ‘top’, {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: ‘clear-overlay’}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/25/dirty-jobs-mike-rowe-thinks-seen-dead-body-video_n_1230127.html

the temptations aardvark eve online klm nene leakes star jones ecards

Emmanuel Dunand / AFP / Getty Images

Emmanuel Dunand / AFP / Getty Images

Republican presidential hopefuls Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul take part in a debate at the University of South Florida in Tampa on Jan. 23, 2012

0 minutes. TV Guide lists a new episode of Fear Factor at 9 p.m. on NBC. It?s called ?Leaches & Shaved Heads & Tear Gas, Oh My! Part 1.? And yet, as the hour strikes, the screen shows another patriotic montage, this time from Tampa, introducing the 18th Republican debate. The NFL plays a 16-game regular season. There are nine circles of hell. God got it done in six days. But democracy is unrelenting, a bit like Joe Rogan, with less forced regurgitation and fewer critter challenges. Which is to say, Fear Factor has been preempted. A fearful nation takes its place.

2 minutes. Blue gels on the audience again, like Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?, except there will be no ?dum-dum-dum,? at least when it comes to sound effects. Brian Williams, the handsomest man to have never been a movie star, is not wasting any time. He lists a lot of bad stuff that former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney has been saying about former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. ?Erratic,? ?failed leader,? it goes on. ?Your response tonight, Mr. Speaker??

3 minutes. Gingrich responds by reciting his r?sum?, with extra emphasis on confusing historical analogies that only he knows. He says President Reagan carried ?more states than Herbert Hoover carried ? than Roosevelt carried against Herbert Hoover.? As is often the case with Gingrich, his words form a shield. By the time he gets to ?They?re not sending somebody to Washington to manage the decay,? it?s impossible to remember what was asked.

(PHOTOS: Political Pictures of the Week)

4 minutes. A wide shot shows Romney standing there, next to Gingrich, with his right hand hanging at his side, ready to draw. But dapper Williams tries again with Gingrich, which allows the former Speaker to continue to take credit for everything good that happened during his decades in the House. ?When I was Speaker, we had four consecutive balanced budgets, the only time in your lifetime, Brian, that we?ve had four consecutive balanced budgets.? This is not true. The four years of surplus ran through 2001. Gingrich resigned from office in 1999. Newt gets 2 out of 4. If this were a history class, he would fail.

5 minutes. Romney gets his chance. ?I think it?s about leadership,? he says, ?and the Speaker was given an opportunity to be the leader of our party in 1994. And at the end of four years, he had to resign in disgrace.? This is the same Mitt Romney who said in the last debate that he wished he had spent more time attacking President Obama and less time attacking his rivals. Romney calls Gingrich an ?influence peddler,? says he encouraged cap and trade and called Paul Ryan?s budget plan ?social engineering.?

(PHOTOS: The Rich History of Mitt Romney)

6 minutes. Gingrich, doing his best imitation of Romney, from when Romney was the front runner, acts like he is too big a deal to worry about the criticism. ?Well, look, I?m not going to spend the evening trying to chase Governor Romney?s misinformation,? he says, adding that he would rather be attacking Obama. ?I just think this is the worst kind of trivial politics.?

8 minutes. Williams still looks like how every 1940s radio-drama detective sounded. He asks Romney whether he can appeal to conservatives. Romney says he does, and pivots. ?Let?s go back to what the Speaker mentioned with regard to leadership,? Romney says. He notes that Gingrich was the first Speaker in history to resign. ?I don?t think we can possibly retake the White House if the person who?s leading our party is the person who was working for the chief lobbyist of Freddie Mac,? he adds.

9 minutes. Romney says almost exactly what Gingrich said after Iowa: that the last election taught him he can?t sit back. He has to go on offense. ?I had incoming from all directions, was overwhelmed with a lot of attacks. And I?m not going to sit back and get attacked day in and day out without returning fire,? Romney says. The two men have traded strategies since South Carolina. Or bodies. Gingrich is now aloof and focused on the general. Romney is trying to muddy the field.

10 minutes. Gingrich returns fire with a couple of zingers: ?He may have been a good financier,? he says of Romney. ?He?s a terrible historian.? So is Gingrich. (See minute 4.) Then Gingrich proceeds to respond to a lot of stuff he just said he would not waste his time talking about. He tells a rosy version of his fall from the top of the House that would not please his fellow historians. ?Apparently, your consultants aren?t very good historians,? Gingrich tells Romney. ?What you ought to do is stop and look at the facts.? The intellectual insult. A classic Gingrich move. Like, I know you are, but what am I?

(WATCH: Breaking Down Mitt Romney?s 14% Tax Rate)

11 minutes. Debonair Williams, he of the slender face and half-Windsor knot, throws it to former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, who has apparently been onstage this entire time. How, asks Williams, is Santorum going to win? Santorum hits his stump speech, saying he is positive and that this is not a two-person race.

14 minutes. There is actually a fourth person onstage as well. Texas Representative Ron Paul gets a question that is basically this: You have no chance of winning, you said you don?t envision yourself in the Oval Office, so will you run as a third-party candidate? Paul says he has been winning the under-30 vote and otherwise doing ?pretty darned well.? Then he calls out the historian on his rosy history about giving up the Speaker?s gavel. ?This idea that he voluntarily reneged and he was going to punish himself because we didn?t do well in the election, that?s just not the way it was.? True that. Then Paul says, once again, that he has ?no plans? to go third party.

17 minutes. Gingrich gets a question about Paul. Gingrich praises Paul for his criticism of the Federal Reserve and desire for a ?gold commission,? which is nothing like a blue-ribbon panel. It would study bringing back gold as currency.

18 minutes. Romney says he will release his tax returns for two years on Tuesday morning. But again, he gets tongue-tied. Rich people don?t like to talk about their own money. It is impolite. So Romney says, ?The real question is not so much my taxes, but the taxes of the American people.? Suddenly, out of nowhere, Romney, who previously opposed any debt compromise that raised any taxes, is praising the Bowles-Simpson plan, which raises tax revenues by nearly $1 trillion. But Romney doesn?t talk about the deficit part. He talks about the cutting marginal rates part, which by itself would make the debt problem worse. He chastises Obama for having ?simply brushed aside? the Bowles-Simpson recommendations, in much the same way that Romney previously did.

20 minutes. More discomfort, as Romney is asked again to talk about his money. ?I pay all the taxes that are legally required and not a dollar more,? he says. ?I don?t think you want someone as the candidate for President who pays more taxes than he owes.? Now that is settled.

21 minutes. Gingrich tries to needle Romney by saying he wants everyone to enjoy Romney?s 15% tax rate. Romney points out that under the Gingrich tax plan, investment gains would be taxed at zero. ?Under that plan, I?d have paid no taxes in the last two years,? Romney says. This is true. It is the reason Gingrich?s policies are better for wealthy financiers than Romney?s policies. Romney would keep his own tax rate on investments at 15%.

(PHOTOS: Newt Gingrich?s Life in Pictures)

22 minutes. More awkward talk about Romney?s wealth. ?I will not apologize for having been successful. I did not inherit what my wife and I have, nor did she. What we have, what I was able to build, I built the old-fashioned way, by earning it,? he says. This is true, if you discount the fact that his father?s money helped put Romney through college (Brigham Young, Stanford) and earn joint degrees at Harvard (Law, Business).

25 minutes. Now it?s time to talk about what lobbying means. Gingrich worked for lobbyists at Freddie Mac, a quasi-government agency that conservatives despise. He also took lots of money from health care companies while at the same time writing articles and giving talks that furthered those companies? agendas in Congress. But technically none of it was lobbying, which is a legal term of art. Williams asks the right question, by avoiding the L word. ?You never peddled influence, as Governor Romney accused you of tonight?? Gingrich can?t answer. ?You know, there is a point in the process where it gets unnecessarily personal and nasty,? he says, before avoiding the question by saying he never lobbied.

28 minutes. Romney and Gingrich go at it. Romney accuses Gingrich of profiting from an organization that destroyed the housing market in Florida. Gingrich tries to compare his consulting work for lobbyists with Romney?s consulting work for corporations. ?Wait a second, wait a second,? protests Gingrich at one point, after Romney admits that his firm made money too. ?We didn?t do any work with the government. I didn?t have an office on K Street,? Romney says. It goes on.

33 minutes. Never-a-bad-hair-day Williams cuts them off and goes to commercial break.

36 minutes. We?re back, with charity time for the other two candidates, who have not had much time to talk. Paul and Santorum speak about the housing market and say nothing new. Then Romney says he wants to help homeowners too. And Gingrich says he wants to repeal Dodd-Frank, the banking-regulation bill, because of its effect on smaller banks. Romney agrees.

43 minutes. Cuba question: ?Let?s say President Romney gets that phone call, and it is to say that Fidel Castro has died. And there are credible people in the Pentagon who predict upward of half a million Cubans may take that as a cue to come to the United States. What do you do?? The premise is a stretch, since Fidel has already ceded most of his government control to his brother Ra?l. Romney tries to make a joke about how Fidel is a bad guy. ?First of all, you thank heavens that Fidel Castro has returned to his maker and will be sent to another land,? he says.

44 minutes. Gingrich retells the joke but gets the punch line right. ?Well, Brian, first of all, I guess the only thing I would suggest is, I don?t think that Fidel is going to meet his maker. I think he?s going to go to the other place,? he says. Fidel-in-hell jokes must poll really well in Miami. Then Gingrich says he would authorize ?covert operations? to overthrow the Castro regime.

46 minutes. ?I would do pretty much the opposite,? says Paul.

47 minutes. Having stirred up the Cuba pot, Williams now accuses the candidates of pandering for votes. Why don?t they care as much about Chinese dissidents and embargo China? Santorum says China is not 90 miles off the coast.

49 minutes. Iran time. Romney criticizes Obama: ?We ought to have an aircraft carrier in the Gulf.? Nevermind that the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln is there right now. Gingrich picks up where Romney left off. ?Dictatorships respond to strength. They don?t respond to weakness,? he says. The same can be said of Republican primary voters.

52 minutes. Romney tears into Obama on Afghanistan, saying the President should not have reduced troops to the level that he did, allowed elections to go bad or announced a withdrawal date.

53 minutes. Paul pretty much has the opposite view.

54 minutes. Another break. ?I?ll welcome two colleagues out here to the stage when we continue from Tampa right after this,? says Williams. Hope for Joe Rogan and Donald Trump. Or Alec Baldwin and Tina Fey.

58 minutes. We?re back. It?s National Journal?s Beth Reinhard and the Tampa Bay Times? Adam Smith. After Santorum gets a chance to talk about the evils of Iran, he is asked about offshore drilling. Santorum says the economy in Florida went bad in 2008 ?because of a huge spike in oil prices,? which is like saying people watch Fear Factor to see Joe Rogan.

62 minutes. Reinhard asks a great question: How can the candidates be against bilingual balloting, even as they advertise in Spanish to Hispanics? Gingrich and Romney don?t really have answers. So they dance around the edges. Everyone onstage is against multilingual education, except Paul, who doesn?t mind if states do whatever they want.

66 minutes. Immigration time. Same as before, except Gingrich makes clear that he would support a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants who serve in the military. Romney agrees. Then Romney says of other undocumented immigrants, ?Well, the answer is self-deportation, which is, people decide they can do better by going home because they can?t find work here, because they don?t have legal documentation to allow them to work here.? Self-deportation is one of those neologisms that gets added to the dictionary at the end of the year. Sign of the times.

70 minutes. Questions about sugar subsidies. Gingrich says you can?t beat the sugar lobby, because ?cane sugar hides behind beet sugar,? and there are ?just too many beet-sugar districts in the United States.? Surely someone can work that into a haiku.

71 minutes. Romney says he is against all subsidies. Then he pivots into a long rant about the awfulness of Obama. It is telling that it has taken Romney 71 minutes to get into this rant on Obama. South Carolina transformed him as a candidate.

72 minutes. Paul is asked if he supports federal funding for conservation of the everglades. He lets down his strict libertarian guard to pander for Florida votes. ?I don?t see any reason to go after that,? he says.

73 minutes. Another break. Things are speeding up.

77 minutes. Some talk about Terri Schiavo, the woman in a vegetative state who became a cause c?l?bre for conservatives in 2005. The answers are inconsequential.

81 minutes. Space-cadet time. No, really. Romney says Obama has no space plan, and America needs a space plan. Gingrich is asked about going to Mars. He says he wants a ?leaner NASA,? but then shares a terribly expensive list of goals: ?Going back to the moon permanently, getting to Mars as rapidly as possible, building a series of space stations and developing commercial space.? At least something new is happening. First time in 18 debates that anyone has talked about Mars.

84 minutes. Gingrich is asked why the Bush tax cuts in the early 2000s did not create a lot of jobs. His answer is priceless. He channels Obama, seemingly unaware of the irony. ?In 2002 and ?03 and ?04, we?d have been in much worse shape without the Bush tax cuts,? he says. That?s what Obama says about the stimulus bill. Both are basically right, though neither would give the other credit.

85 minutes. Last break. Almost there. Actually, scratch that. You will never get there. When this debate ends, there will be another. The next one is on Thursday. No joke.

90 minutes. We?re back. Romney is asked what he has done to further the cause of conservatism. He is sort of stumped. Talks about his family and his work in the private sector, neither of which is ideological.

92 minutes. Gingrich talks about how he went to Goldwater meetings in 1964, when he would have turned 21.

93 minutes. Santorum is asked about electability. Suddenly he comes alive. It?s the best moment of any of his debates. Yet few will ever notice, and it will almost certainly not matter. He makes the case that he is the only true conservative who can take on Obama, and that both Romney and Gingrich are fundamentally flawed because they are too close to the political positions of Obama. ?There is no difference between President Obama and these two gentlemen,? Santorum says. This is not true, if you were wondering.

95 minutes. Paul talks about the Constitution.

97 minutes. Romney talks about RomneyCare and ObamaCare.

98 minutes. Gingrich says, ?I never ask anyone to be for me. Because if they are for me, they vote yes and go home and say, I sure hope Newt does it. I ask people to be with me, because I think this will be a very hard, very difficult journey.? No doubt.

99 minutes. Romney, who talks all the time about ?restoring American greatness,? is asked when America was last great. ?America still is great,? Romney says, thus undercutting the meaning of his signature campaign message.

101 minutes. That?s it. See you Thursday.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/us/*http%3A//us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/external/time_rss/rss_time_us/httpswamplandtimecom20120124whatyoumissedwhilenotwatchingthenbcgopdebateinfloridaxidrssnationyahoo/44294921/SIG=13tc6jcj2/*http%3A//swampland.time.com/2012/01/24/what-you-missed-while-not-watching-the-nbc-gop-debate-in-florida/?xid=rss-nation-yahoo

rajon rondo va gwyneth paltrow beck dodge charger pay per view azalea

JAIPUR, India ? Oprah Winfrey says she is confident that President Barack Obama will win another four-year term in this year’s U.S. election.

The talk show host was addressing a literary festival Sunday in the northwestern Indian town of Jaipur.

Winfrey praised Obama’s handling of the presidency. She said his next four years would be even more successful, with people able to get back to work.

Winfrey backed Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign in her first-ever political endorsement.

She was among the biggest crowd pullers at the annual Jaipur Literary Festival, which brings together top writers, poets and critics and around 50,000 literary fans from around the world.

Winfrey has been in India for a week filming programs for her new TV network.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/celebrity/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120122/ap_on_en_tv/as_india_oprah_obama

siesta beach usta nba finals schedule air france 447 eddie long adam ant kevin mchale

Somewhere in corporate Hamburgerland, an ad executive with a penchant for “social media” and “the Twitter” thought a McDonalds-themed hashtag would sell more food. Oh boy was he wrong. Mickey D’s Twitter push is backfiring harder than E. coli vomit. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/PvufhMDzB0o/mcdonalds-twitter-marketing-turns-into-disgusting-customer-revolt

erin brockovich serbia huguette clark fleet week bosnia supernova wcpo